Buyer guide

MTC 3.1 Certificate Template Fields: What Buyers Should Check Under EN 10204

A field-by-field checklist for reviewing an EN 10204 3.1 mill test certificate without relying on fake sample certificates or incomplete templates.

August 13, 20267 min readHebei Haihao Group
化学成分检测.JPG
化学成分检测.JPG
Sources used:
- EVS EN 10204:2004 summary
- SIS SS-EN 10204:2005 summary
- SGS Japan EN 10204 3.2 material certification page

Why Buyers Search for an MTC Template

Many buyers search for an "MTC 3.1 template" because they want to know whether a supplier's certificate is complete. The safer approach is not to copy a sample certificate. A sample can be fake, outdated, or unrelated to your product. Instead, use a field checklist based on the purpose of EN 10204 inspection documents.

Public summaries of EN 10204 describe it as a standard for types of inspection documents for metallic products. For pipe fittings and flanges, the certificate must help the buyer connect the delivered product to the order, material grade, heat number and required test results.

Core Fields to Check

For an EN 10204 3.1 MTC, buyers should normally check these fields:

FieldWhy it matters
Supplier / manufacturer nameConfirms who issued the document
Buyer / purchase order numberConnects the certificate to the order
Product descriptionConfirms fitting type, flange type, size or wall thickness
Material standard and gradeExample: ASTM A234 WPB, ASTM A350 LF2, ASTM A105N
Heat number or batch numberLinks the certificate to product marking
Chemical analysisVerifies material composition against the required standard
Mechanical propertiesVerifies tensile, yield, elongation or impact tests when required
Heat treatmentImportant for low-temperature, normalized or quenched-tempered products
NDT or supplementary test resultsRequired when the PO or project specification asks for it
Signature / stamp / issue dateConfirms the document was formally issued

This is not a fake certificate template. It is a buyer's review structure.

What 3.1 Does Not Solve Alone

A 3.1 certificate does not automatically prove that every project requirement has been met. The buyer still needs to compare the MTC with the purchase order, product standard, drawing, inspection plan and final client specification.

If the project requires independent witness or validation, the buyer may need EN 10204 3.2 or a separate third-party inspection report. SGS Japan's EN 10204 3.2 material certification page is one public example showing that 3.2 certification involves an inspection body role.

Common Red Flags

Be careful when you see:

  • Heat number on MTC does not match product marking
  • Standard or grade is missing
  • Certificate says only "quality certificate" without EN 10204 type
  • Chemical or mechanical test values are blank
  • The product description does not match the ordered item
  • The MTC is for mother pipe only, while the delivered item is a formed fitting
  • NDT is mentioned in the quotation but no report is attached

How to Write the Requirement in an RFQ

A clear RFQ can say:

"Supplier shall provide EN 10204 3.1 material test certificate for each heat/batch. MTC shall show purchase order reference, material grade, heat number, chemical analysis, mechanical test results, heat treatment where applicable, product description and traceability to product marking."

If a third party must be involved, state that separately. Do not assume 3.1 and 3.2 are interchangeable.

  • ASTM A234 WPB elbows, tees, reducers and caps
  • ASTM A350 LF2/LF3/LF6 low-temperature flanges
  • ASTM A105 forged flanges and fittings
  • Stainless steel and alloy steel pipe fittings requiring traceability

Further Reading

Need a quote for the products mentioned in this article?

Submit your specs and our pressure piping team will respond within one business day.

Send RFQ

Share

Quote in 4 hours

Products covered in this article

Sourcing any of these? Send the spec and our pressure-piping desk replies within 4 business hours.

Related reading